CA: Recall effort for Brock Turner judge gaining momentum

[ABC 10]

The campaign to recall the judge who sentenced former Stanford University swimmer Brock Turner to six months in jail for sexually assaulting a woman appears to be gaining momentum.

Stanford law professor Michele Dauber, who’s behind the effort to recall Santa Clara County Judge Aaron Persky, told ABC10 that they now have more than 70,000 petition signatures.

“When Judge Persky gave Brock Turner only six months in jail for three felony sex crimes, he gave Turner the same kind of privilege that Harvey Weinstein and others have received over the years,” said Dauber. “That is unacceptable.”

 

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well, I’m not sure what to say, I’m not completely familiar with all the facts of this case, but he should be punished in some way. I don’t know for how long etc, but every case is different and I’m sure the judge took this into consideration. I literally see at least 1-2 news articles of female teachers being arrested weekly for having sex with underage students. I find this (authority figures) both disturbing and thought provoking. Some of (women on girls at times) stories are very disturbing. Yet, I later read many just receive probation/parole? So, I sometimes wonder if the judicial system views women differently? In my case, the DA found 3 women all lying, discussing the case with the Detective (at the same time/same room) and this is what eventually destroyed my case. So, I hope the judge prevails!

People are angry because had he not been a white college athlete he would be in prison for at least 5 years for having sex with (raping) an unconscious woman as unconcious people have no way of consenting.

This whole campaign disgusts me, as they are missing the point. My son was a victim of mandatory minimums and our family truly believes that if his sentence was in the hands of the elected judge, who’s face showed shock at the reading of the guilty verdict, that his fate might have been similar to Turners. Additionally, I attended Turner’s sentencing and while the outcome was predicted to be unpopular and then some, the judge spent a good deal of time justifying his decision as it related to the elements of the law as well as correlating the facts of the case to the corresponding codes. He did the job he was elected to do. The general public, thanks to media ignorance, never factored in the lifetime punishment that Turner would face by being on this ridiculously punitive registry. The stories of so many on this site need to get out there in full force to educate these morons who think that all of you are nothing but predators and pedophiles. Sorry for rambling. Just sick and tired of the uninformed, and this Dauber wacko has a questionable history and reputation and I’m tired of her unfounded platforms!!

What we are watching is a lynch mob in action